Visitability : 誰もが隣人になれるまちづくりの一歩は貧困層への住宅建築支援から始まった (特集 地域リハビリテーション)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This report is the first introduction of visitability to Japan. Sometimes called basic home access and inclusive home design, the visitability movement promotes meaningful policy changes to require several essential features in every new home: 1) a zero-step entrance; 2) interior doors, including bathrooms, with at least 32 inches of clear passage space; and 3) at least a half bath, preferably a full bath, on the main floor. Visitability was originally proposed as concrete change by Eleanor Smith in Atlanta, Georgia, in 1987. Since then, the visitability movement has had significant impacts on home construction policy in North America, especially in the United States and Canada. As a recent success of visitability, two cities recently passed ordinances requiring basic access features in all new houses: Vancouver, British Colombia, in 2013, and Austin, Texas, in 2014. The author also discusses the fundamental significance and contemporary importance of visitability, which originated from collaborative efforts supporting popular home-building advocacy for the poor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it