MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7146357267

Religious Freedom of Hutterite in Canada : Religious Institutionalism and Legal Pluralism

2021· article· ja· W7146357267 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kento Yamamoto, 健人 山本

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticultural Socio-Legal Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReligious freedomReligious pluralismPluralism (philosophy)Freedom of religionLegal pluralismInstitutionalism
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本論文では,カナダにおけるフッタライトの特異な宗教的実践・生活様式と国家法秩序との関係を検討する。この関係を検討するにあたって,本論文では法多元主義と宗教制度主義の観点を補助線として引く。法多元主義は,「法」を国家法にのみ限定するのではなく,非国家法をも「法」と認識する立場であり,宗教制度主義は,個人主義を前提にする信教の自由理解が,信者の実際の生活を説明するのに不十分であることを指摘し,宗教制度・組織の側面から信教の自由理解を補足するべきだ,という立場である。この二つの立場から検討することで,フッタライトの宗教実践と国家法の関係をより深く理解できるように思われる。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.919

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0230.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)Same topicMulticultural Socio-Legal StudiesFrench-language works237,207