Bibliographic record
Abstract
From July 31st (Monday) to August 3rd (Thursday), 2023, the Laboratory of Textile Culture of the Department of Textile and Clothing did an academic survey (complete survey) of costumes inherited from the Hachisuka family of the Tokushima Domain at the Tokushima Prefectural Tokushima Castle Museum. The research was conducted in the following order: womenʼs clothing, menʼs clothing, childrenʼs clothing, and fukusa from the Edo period. As a result, for womenʼs clothing, three uchikake, two kosode, one furisode, one katabira, and one hitoe from the late Edo period and first half of the 19th century were found, as well as two obi sash from the first half of the 19th century. was also confirmed. As for menʼs clothing, three sets of kamishimo, one kataginu, one hakama, and three noshime were found. There are a large number of childrenʼs clothing. 18 items, of which 14 items are for baby and small child are four-piece items. Furthermore, when categorized by gender, 12 items were for boys and 6 items were for girls. Four of the fukusa coverlet were made in the late Edo period and first half of the 19th century, two were made in the late Edo period in the mid-19th century, and two were made in the mid-Meiji period and late 19th century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".