MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7146841500

出稼ぎと仕送りが子供の就学達成度におよぼす影響について: カンボジア農村の事例より

2017· article· en· W7146841500 on OpenAlexaff
Seiichi Fukui, Likanan Luch

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsLibrary of Parliament
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess (computing)Identification (biology)Product (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

途上国における出稼ぎ労働者の数と仕送りが急速に増加しており、それが家計におよぼす影響に関心が集まっている。本稿では、貧困世帯が多数居住するカンボジア農村を対象に、出稼ぎと仕送りが、6歳から17歳までの子供の就学、とりわけ、就学達成度におよぼす影響について分析する。そのために、『カンボジア社会経済調査2009年版』を用い、操作変数法を適用することにより分析を行う。従来の研究では、適切な操作変数が得られず、出稼ぎ家計員の有無と仕送りの変数を同時に組み込んで、出稼ぎと仕送りによる子供の教育への純効果を推計することは困難であった。この点を克服するための方法を考案した点に、本稿の貢献がある。分析結果は、仕送りによる正の影響は家計員の出稼ぎにともなう不在による負の影響を相殺し、純効果が正であること、および、この効果は、とくに、女子において顕著であることを示している。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.010
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0200.028
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)→Same topicMilitary Technology and Strategies→French-language works237,207→