MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7147055959 · doi:10.7202/1123945ar

Évaluation de l’acceptabilité dans le cadre d’un déploiement technologique au sein d’un milieu résidentiel accueillant des adultes autistes avec/sans déficience intellectuelle

2025· article· fr· W7147055959 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Yves A. Lussier, Karine Ayotte, Rosalie Ruel, Laurence Pépin-Beauchesne

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue francophone de la déficience intellectuelle · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerceptionWork (physics)Group dynamicPrejudice (legal term)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’évolution rapide de l’ère numérique force les organisations à innover pour s’arrimer aux besoins émergents. Toutefois, l’intégration d’une nouvelle technologie peut entrainer des résistances auprès des parties prenantes impliquées. Conséquemment, il s’avère pertinent de mesurer leurs perceptions au fil du temps. L’objectif de cette étude consiste à examiner les perceptions des employés travaillant au sein d’un milieu résidentiel accueillant des adultes autistes avec/sans déficience intellectuelle au sujet de l’implantation de solutions technologiques (tablettes numériques et applications). Pour ce faire, un devis descriptif longitudinal à trois temps de mesure a été utilisé. Au total, 16 employés ont participé. Les résultats obtenus montrent que les perceptions des participants se sont modifiées positivement et négativement dans le temps, en fonction de leurs interactions avec les solutions technologiques implantées, permettant ainsi d’identifier des leviers d’action et des obstacles à la démarche de déploiement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue francophone de la déficience intellectuelleSame topicFamily and Disability Support ResearchFrench-language works237,207