MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7147268335 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.19352979

D2.1 Sustainability baseline, Use Cases, and Baseline Requirements

2025· article· en· W7147268335 on OpenAlexaff
Clare McCarthy, Ross D. Staton, E. Poonkizhali, Christoph Schmelz, Dariush Mohammad Soleymani, Zeljko Stankovic, Jafar Mohammadi, Berna Sayrac, Louise Renoux, Azzedine Gati, Olivier Bouchet, Marie‐Hélène Hamon, Samira Jaber, Jean Dion, Patrick Savelli, Guillaume Vercasson, Mattia Merluzzi, Emma Complido, S. Bories, Luigi Briguglio, Margot Bezzi, Lucas Pereira Carwile, Carmela Occhipinti, Barbara Gede, Krisztián Fehér, Adrián Gallego Sánchez, Felix Dsouza, Hans Einsiedler, Ali Balador, Xuejun Cai, Lackis Eleftheriadis, Agne Aberg Larsson, Hannes Larsson, Sepideh Matinfar, Josilo Sladan, Selome Kostentinos Tesfatsion, Gustav Wikström, Ahmed Arif, Imane Oussakel, Anastasius Gavras, Alessandro Bassi, Marcus Reutemann, Shaden Baradie, Chesney Buyle, Thomas Feys, Liesbet Van der Perre, Gilles Callebaut, Jona Cappelle, Emanuele Peschiera, François Rottenberg, Andrea Novaresio, D. Chiaroni, Laurent-Walter Goix, Chaima Ghribi, Arturo Basaure, Marja Matinmikko-Blue, Athanasios Bachoumis, Spyros Batistatos, Christos Tranoris, Sandro Moos, Mónica Tristán, Antonio Sainz, Tompros Spyridon, Frank Hieromnimon, Kostas KOUTSOPOULOS, Julie Bradford, Osman Hassan, Daniel Hauer, A. Steinwendtner, Alfred Einfalt, Konrad Diwold, Kim Schindhelm, Mauro Renato Boldi, Magnani Nicola, Bruno Melis, D. Sorbara, Leonardo Lo Schiavo, Albert Banchs, Sokratis Barmpounakis, Panagiotis Demestichas

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsPancreas Centre (Canada)
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsDeliverableSustainabilityBaseline (sea)Key (lock)Foundation (evidence)Duration (music)Work (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This deliverable establishes the baseline framework for embedding sustainability into 6G networks, addressing both "Sustainable 6G" and "6G for Sustainability" aspects. It defines environmental, societal, and economic sustainability pillars and introduces key design principles, trade-offs, and evaluation metrics. A state-of-the-art review of enabling technologies and eco-design strategies is provided. The document also outlines -driven requirements derived from nine use cases across agriculture, smart grid, and telemedicine sectors. This foundation will guide technical development, system-level integration, and future validation within SUSTAIN-6G.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.668

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207