MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7147269056 · doi:10.1080/23322551.2026.2627163

Scenario Machine: Aesthetics of Absence in Lawrence Abu Hamdan’s <i>45th Parallel</i> .

2025· article· en· W7147269056 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard Allen

Bibliographic record

VenueTheatre & Performance Design · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicContemporary Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)ClothingFace (sociological concept)NarrativePhotography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lawrence Abu Hamdan’s 45th Parallel (Citation2022) is a 15-minute film of a performance staged with painted theatrical backdrops at the Haskell Free Library and Opera House, a building constructed in 1904 on the United States and Canadian border, to symbolically mark the dividing line between the two countries. Abu Hamdan’s film narrates the real story of a fatal cross-border extra-judicial shooting at the US-Mexico border, re-told utilising the scenographic affordances of this setting to draw attention to the hypocrisy of border violence. In offering a detailed exposition of the work as encountered in its exhibition format, the article demonstrates how this is achieved through scenographic means and the activation of overt theatricality (e.g. painted backdrops, direct address, a musical underscore and multi-channel sound). By deploying the notion of theatre as an investigative form and mode of critique, the article considers how the scenographic approaches employed in 45th Parallel explicate the political potentiality of an aesthetics of absence and enable the disappeared protagonists of the stories being told to re-appear without either being dramatically represented or theatrically re-enacted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0120.014
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheatre & Performance DesignSame topicContemporary Literature and CriticismFrench-language works237,207