Fly the Moon to Me: Bimanual 3D Locomotion in Virtual Reality By Manipulating the Position of the Destination Object
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Teleportation - changing the point of view in 3D space by specifying a position - is one of the most common locomotion solutions in VR. However, it currently lacks a mechanism to adjust the height in 3D space, and it is difficult for users to predict the exact final view after the teleportation. Users are relocated to a place without knowing what the final view will look like. As a result, they often need to perform remedial interactions to achieve their ideal position, which can be time-consuming and effort-intensive. In this paper, we present Fly the Moon to Me (Locomoontion), a novel technique that enables users to bring their destination to themselves through object manipulation. Users first create a copy of the object they want to approach as a preview by selecting it, then bring it to an ideal position and direction using existing object manipulation techniques, and then snap the original object to the preview together with the rest of the world. A controlled experiment with 18 participants via a teleportation task reveals that Locomoontion is more effective than the traditional Point&Teleport technique with grabbing the world as a remedy to adjust the final positioning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".