MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7147419150 · doi:10.1134/s1810232826700013

Vortex Structure and Instability Characteristics of Dean–Taylor Flow through a Rotating Bent Square-Shaped Enclosure

2025· article· en· W7147419150 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering Thermophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNusselt numberCurvatureFlow (mathematics)InstabilityEnclosureVortexHeat transferStreamlines, streaklines, and pathlinesBuoyancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present paper investigates solution structure, instability characteristics, and chaotic nature of the Dean–Taylor flow with energy distribution through a rotating bent square-shaped enclosure adopting a spectral-based numerical approach. The channel is rotated about the vertical axis in the positive direction for the Taylor number $$0 \leqslant {\text{Tr}} \leqslant 2000$$ . A temperature difference is applied across the vertical walls while a room temperature is maintained on the horizontal walls. Numerical calculations are carried out for the Dean number $${\text{Dn}} = 1000$$ over a wide of curvature ranging from 0.001 to 0.5, and the combined effects of centrifugal, Coriolis, and buoyancy forces are examined. As a result, three branches of asymmetric steady solutions (SS), composed of 2- to 4-vortex solutions, are obtained by using arc-length path continuation technique. To understand the unsteady nature, the transient solution is then inspected by time series analysis, and flow transition is precisely identified by determining the phase trajectory of the temporal development and assessing the power spectrum density. The study shows that, as Tr increases, the flow progresses through various instabilities namely multi-periodic, chaotic, steady-state, periodic, and then chaotic-state again, demonstrating a transition that features asymmetric 2- to 8-vortex solutions. Nusselt numbers are calculated as a measure of convective heat transfer (HT) between the heating wall and the fluid, and it is discovered that chaotic flow (SF) considerably improves convective heat transfer (CHT). Finally, our computational findings are assessed against previously reported experimental data, and an adequate consistency is observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score0.839

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it