Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pygmy Nuthatch (Sitta pygmaea): Bird first sighted in Regina on 6 November 2023 by Dan Sawatzky.The nuthatch was seen in the neighbourhood by many observers (when it was active between 09:28 and 16:18 hr), until the last sightings on 10 January 2024 (S158647690; S158647819); Bob Bowhay took one photograph of this bird on 10 January (15:30 hr) with very fluffed up body feathers (eBird S158596025; ML613382922).For more information on this record, see Sawatzky and Taylor.4,10 Status: Accidental.First confirmed record for Saskatchewan.Last seen 10 January 2024 after its long, 66-day stay.Remarks: In a review of North American Christmas Bird Count data, T Root stated that "a January average minimum temperature of -12 °C was [a threshold] too low for this small bird".11 The Regina Pygmy Nuthatch experienced milder than average winter weather between 6 November 2023 and 7 January 2024 with the mean daily temperatures staying above the -12 °C threshold, except on 23 November 2023 (low of -14 °C).Then on 8 January 2024, mean daily temperatures fell and remained below the critical threshold,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".