Phrygia’daki Temenouthyrai’den “Westmacott Epheb” Tipinde Bir Roma Kopyası
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents a new example from Asia Minor of Polykleitos' famous athlete statues, which can mostly be traced through Roman-period copies. The statue, depicting a naked young man standing upright, was found in 2000 during a foundation excavation in the city center of Uşak province. The study first provides a detailed description of the statue and then discusses its typology and iconography. The statue, understood to be a copy of the Westmacott Epheb type, is thought to have been produced between the last quarter of the 1st century AD and the first half of the 2nd century AD, possibly for decorative use in an important public building (a Roman bath or theater) or in the house of an elite Roman based on similar examples. The Temenouthyrai copy stands out as the only known findspot copy from Asia Minor, apart from the Aphrodisias head and the Tarsus example (only a variant). With this study, the statue in question takes its place as a qualified example among the copies of the Westmacott Epheb type that have survived to the present day. This statue is a very close example of a model known for its dimensions and artistic craftsmanship, contributing greatly to the level of sophistication of the art of sculpture in the Roman province of Asia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".