MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7148207849

Yekgûş Dîvân (Analysis, critical text, index)

2025· dissertation· tr· W7148207849 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHitit University Institutional Repository · 2025
Typedissertation
Languagetr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTurkish Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMysticismQuarter (Canadian coin)TurkishValue (mathematics)Order (exchange)Period (music)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Divans, which occupy a distinguished place among text-based works representing the core of Classical Turkish literature studies, possess significant value regardless of the century in which they were composed. The tradition of writing divans -whether arranged systematically or not- has been maintained for centuries in accordance with a particular method, ensuring the continuity of the strong connection between past and future. As works that reflect both a shared literary language and the traces of social change and transformation, divans serve as touchstones of a robust civilization's literary sphere. For this reason, they have consistently attracted the interest of researchers in every period. Abdülkâdir Bilgiç (d. 1880–1957), who lived from the last quarter of the nineteenth century to the first half of the twentieth century, was a scholar and poet raised in the Nehrî Madrasa, one of the significant centers of the Naqshbandī-Khalidī school. He belonged to a family distinguished for its scholarly and Sufi background. His Yekgûş Dîvân, which is thought to have been completed in 1955 and which reflects both the environment in which he lived and the cultural heritage he inherited, comprises two manuscripts -one 107 folios and the other 147 folios- most of which consist of panegyrics and elegies. In addition to its religious and mystical characteristics, the work also reveals the author's scholarly disposition. Bilgiç states that he composed the divan in order to preserve the names and renown of great predecessors, to guide future generations toward these esteemed figures, and thereby to ensure the continuity of cultural heritage. The divan contains numerous Turkish, Persian, and Kurdish poems written in various verse forms and genres. vii This study aims not only to present the life and literary persona of Abdülkâdir Bilgiç -about whom no information is found in biographical sources- but also to make available to researchers the transliterated text and analysis of his Yekgûş Dîvân. In this context, a general outline of the author's life and literary character has been drawn based on information obtained from three written sources and from the divan itself; subsequently, the work has been analyzed in terms of form and content, and a transliterated text prepared from the two extant manuscripts has been included. The appendices present the compiled index, copies of Abdülkâdir Bilgiç's official service records, and selected samples from the manuscript copies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it