MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7148227988

O caracter da unica monarchia americana

2012· other· W7148227988 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Afonso, Almino, 1840-1899

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Digital Library (Federal Senate) · 2012
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Quarter (Canadian coin)Work (physics)Governo
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O autor, jurista, jornalista, político e membro da Academia Norte-riograndense de Letras, formou-se pela Faculdade de Direito do Recife (1871) e iniciou a vida como promotor público na Paraíba, passando mais tarde a Procurador Fiscal dos Feitos da Fazenda em Fortaleza. Foi um dos que mais contribuiu com a causa abolicionista no Ceará e no Rio Grande do Norte, obtendo em algumas localidades o fim da escravidão muito antes da Lei Áurea. Orador talentoso, ficou conhecido como O Tribuno da Abolição. Como jornalista dirigiu o jornal "O Libertador" em Fortaleza e partiu posteriormente para Manaus em 1884, dirigindo o jornal "O Rio Branco". Lá elegeu-se vereador e, mais tarde, como deputado federal, participou ativamente dos trabalhos constituintes. Em 1894 tornou-se senador da República pelo Rio Grande do Norte, sendo grande oposicionista do governo Prudente de Moraes. Faleceu no exercício do cargo em 1899, deixando algumas obras entre as quais “Os Rodrigões do Império, ou Caráter da Única Monarquia Americana". Tratam-se de artigos do periódico O Libertador, e outros textos, de cunho abolicionista, em ataque a Antonio Joaquim Rodrigues Junior, Ministro da Guerra, e Lourenço Cavalcanti de Albuquerque, Ministro das Relações Exteriores, e mais tarde dos Transportes e Agricultura. A obra foi publicada por Almino Affonso com o pseudônimo de Junius Brutus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0100.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Digital Library (Federal Senate)French-language works237,207