MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7149009131 · doi:10.71465/ajbd863

Exploring the Use of Big Data in Improving Public Transportation Systems

2025· article· W7149009131 on OpenAlexaff
M. J. A. JOHNSON

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal Of Big Data · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBig dataPublic transportSustainabilityAnalyticsIntelligent transportation systemPredictive analyticsResource (disambiguation)Data collection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Public transportation systems are essential for urban mobility and sustainability, but they often face challenges such as congestion, inefficiency, and resource constraints. The use of Big Data analytics has the potential to address these challenges by providing real-time insights into transportation patterns, optimizing routes, and improving decision-making processes. This paper explores the various ways in which Big Data is being applied to enhance public transportation systems, from traffic monitoring and predictive analytics to sustainability and passenger experience improvements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.772

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.295
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.012 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal Of Big DataSame topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207