MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7149218590

Current Range of the Eastern Population of Painted Bunting (<i>passerina Ciris</i>) Part 1: Breeding

2005· article· W7149218590 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P.W. Sykes, Stephen Holzman

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 2005
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIdentification and Quantification in Food
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Park ServiceU.S. Forest ServiceUnited States Marine CorpsU.S. Air ForceU.S. Department of TransportationU.S. NavyU.S. Department of AgricultureNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationU.S. Department of EnergyU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsBuntingRange (aeronautics)Current (fluid)Population
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the current breeding range of Painted Bunting (Passerina ciris) in a series of maps and a narrative, in particular that of the eastern population, which is restricted to the states of North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida.Some conservation measures are recommended to protect this population.In light of the exten-sive habitat loss in the Outer Coastal Plain of these states, which comprise the areas of the populations greatest densuy, tt is tmperatwe that a consortium of diverse interests work together to provide sufficient habitats for this colorful native songbird.OVERVIEW The breeding range of Painted Bunting (Passerina ciris) in the eastern United States is restricted to a small portion of the Atlantic Coastal Plain of four southeastern states.Partners in Flight (P1F) originally listed the bunting as a highly ranked Species at Risk (4.29/5.00) in need of attention in a physiographic region of high importance (Hunter et al. 1993a, 1993b).More recently, PIF revised and expanded its classification system and published it in the North American Consetration Plan (Rich et al. 2004), placing the Painted Bunting in the Species of Continental Importance for the United States and Canada: Watch List Species--Restricted distribution or low population size.Two subspecies, P c. ciris and P c. pallidior, have been described based upon morphological variation.However, these two subspecies are only weakly differentiated (Storer 1951).Plumages and morphometrics show much overlap and are minor, clinal, and not distinctive enough to warrant nomenclatural distinctions (Thompson 1991a, Lowther et al. 1999).A further biological concern is that the two subspecies as currently described do not coincide with the 550-km (341-mi) gap centered on 85 W longitude that currently separates the eastern and western breeding populations (Figure 1).Given the current state of knowledge, it seems more accurate to treat the eastern and western populations rather than the eastern and western subspecies.From what is presently known, the eastern and western populations are allopatric on the breeding grounds as well as the wintering grounds.These two breeding populations differ dramatically in timing and pattern of molt, timing of migration, and in several morphological characteristics, thus suggesting differences at the species level (Thompson 1991a, 1991b).Based upon the work of Thompson (1991a, 1991b), Sibley and Monroe (1993) recognized the eastern and western populations as separate species: Eastern Painted-Bunting (Passerma ciris) and Western Painted-Bunting (P.pallidiot).The Committee on Classification and Nomenclature of the American Ornithologists' Union has not yet made a decision on such a split.To clarify if such a split is warranted, a study of genetic divergence of the eastern and western populations of the Painted Bunting is currently underway by J. T. Klicka, C. W. Thompson, and Sykes; mitochondrial and nucleolar DNA are being examined from materials from the breeding and wintering ranges of the two populations.Since the taxonomic question of a split has not yet been resolved, we simply refer to the eastern birds as the eastern population.This eastern breeding population of Painted Bunnng is found along the Atlantic coast from southeastern North Carolina to northeastern Florida and extends inland in South Carolina and Georgia (Figures 1 and 2).The recent literature gives the breeding range of the eastern population of Painted Bunting in relatively general terms (Stokes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.312
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)Same topicIdentification and Quantification in FoodFrench-language works237,207