MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7149219370

Special Interregional Report Hurricane <i>isabel</i> of 2003

2004· article· W7149219370 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ricky Davis, Todd M. Day, Marshall J. Iliff, Robert C. Leberman, Steve Kelling, David H. Elder

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 2004
Typearticle
Language
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNatural disasterGovernment (linguistics)Context (archaeology)StormClimate change
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

cane increased, it maintained a Category 2 status (85-90-knot maximum winds) for the next two days.With its eye gradually filling, Isabel made landfall near Drum lnlet, North Carolina around 1:00 p.m. 18 September as a Category 2 hurricane (Figure 1), then weakened slowly as it moved across eastern North Carolina.It weakened to a tropical storm over central Virginia and lost tropical characteristics as it moved across western Pennsylvania on 19 September.Isabel brought tropical-storm conditions to a large area from central North Carolina northward to the eastern Great Lakes and western New England.Extratropical Isabel moved northward into Canada and was absorbed into a larger baroclinic system moving eastward across south-central Canada early on 20 September.The many bird sightings listed in this Special Report must surely relate to the size and strength of Isabel, which was only the fifth hurricane in recorded history to sustain Category 5 intensity for 30 hours.Both the Air Force Reserve Hurricane Hunters and the NOAA Hurricane Hunters flew missions into the storm and measured the strongest wind ever observed in an Ariantic hurricane: 203 knots (or 234 m.p.h.) at 4500 feet on the afternoon of 13 September.The lowest pressure observed by reconnaissance aircraft was 920 mb 12 September.More than for any hurricane in the past, birders in the storms path were prepared, both for the damage to property and infrastructure (the storm track was very well predicted almost a week in advance) and for the inevitable fallout of seabirds and shorebirds that occurs with landfalling Atlantic tropical cyclones.Those birders who were able to venture out safely--and many in North Carolina and Virginia had no such opportunity-discovered thousands of displaced birds, including pelagic seabirds.Many of these were commendably well documented with photographs, field sketches, and notes, and a few specimens were obtained as well.Notably, storm-petrds were studied in the interior, from North Carolina to Ontario, and for the first time in many areas, at least some storm-petrels were convincingly identified to species, with the rarest of the brown species inland--Wilson's Storm-Petrel identified in interior North Carolina, Virginia, Pennsylvania, New York, and Ontario.One probable Wilson's Storm-Petrel was even noted 20

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)Same topicTropical and Extratropical Cyclones ResearchFrench-language works237,207