Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thrushes were in the storm-related mix in the w.Aleutians 21-25 May+ (ATTOUR, DDG), with a peak of 3 at Attu 21-23 May.Another 3 were also noted at Attu 3-4 Jun (ATTOUR).Heinl submitted details of what was considered an imm.male Naumann's Dusky Thrush, T. n. naumanni, from Attu's Gilbert Bluffs 20-21 May (ATTOUR).This more southerly race reaches the Pacific Coast barely to the s.Sea of Okhotsk, and this report constitutes the Regions 2nd and the first in spring.Another suspicious pair of Blackbacked Wagtails resided at Attu 13 May-13 Jun near a structure where the species has previously nested (ATTOUR).Up to 6 Olive-backed Pipits made a decent spring peak at Attu 13 May-1 Jun+ (ATTOUR, DDG).Two small groups of Rustic Buntings arrived at Attu only, induding 4 on 13-25 May and another 4 on 2-5 Jun (ATTOUR).Bralnblings were described in small numbers, with maxima of only 13 at Arm 18 & 19 May and in the w.Aleutians 13 May-3 Jun+ (ATTOUR, DDG).The only report from elsewhere was of 2 together at Gambell 29 May (TS, MMR, VENT).At Attu and Shemya 1-13 Jun, Common Rosefinches made the Regions best showing since the Jun 1977 Gambell fallout, with a peak 7 at Attu 3 Jun (ATTOUR, DDG).The Ketchikan areas 2nd-ever May Purple Finch, which remains a rare winter/spring visitor in S.E., appeared at a feeder there 6 Jun (JFK).A flighty male Bullfinch, the 4th for the w.Aleutians, was reported without details from Attu 14-15 May (ATTOUR).Evening Grosbeaks were up the Taku R., probably part of the winter push that also brought one to Juneau (q.v.winter), last seen 7 Apr (SZ).Up to 9 were reported from the Tulsequah area in April (fide AD), and singles were seen near Canyon I. 5 Apr (AD) and at the Canada border 9 May (TS).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.834 | 0.760 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".