Bibliographic record
Abstract
plain the large numbers of sparrows seen during migration in s.Yukon and Northwest Ierritories.In Whse., a Porter Creek feeder hosted an impressive 32 Fox Sparrows 15 Sep, an imm.Golden-crowned Sparrow 24-27 Sep, and a peak of 90 Dark-eyed Juncos 10 Oct, along with a well-documented ad.male Oregon Junco 7-12 Oct (ph.CE, PS).Elsewhere in s.Yukon, a Canyon Cr. feeder had single White-throated and Golden-crowned Sparrows 26-29 Oct (RR); another White-throated Sparrow appeared at a Whse.feeder in late Nov and stayed into the winter (RE).Io the east, hundreds of Dark-eyed Juncos, along with a few White-crowned and Fox Sparrows, were noted at a Norman Wells, NWI feeder 18 Sep (RP).Ihe Yukon's long-awaited first-documented Harris's Sparrow, an imm., was banded at Watson Lake 25 Sep (ph.IMK).A flock of 300 Snow Buntings was at the Mendenhall R., sw.Yukon 21 Oct (CE).A male and a femaletype Rose-breasted Grosbeak were at Albert Cr., about 150 km w. of the species' range, 31 Jul-1 Aug; the begging and quivering wings of the female47pe raised the possibility that it was in [act a young bird (RB, ugust and September continued wet and cool, after one of the coldest and dampest summers on record.October and November were more normal, butfields remained waterlogged and many crops were spoiled or could not be harvested, creating a feast for many geese, swans, and dabbling ducks.Breeding success in the north had been miserable during the summer, and this was reflected in the low percentage of young geese and shorebirds seen on migration.Ihe season was highlighted by numerous rare gulls, a notable incursion of some owls, and a string of rare and lingering warblers.Among passerines, Cathams thrushes, Brown Creepers, and White-crowned Sparrows stood out by their scarcity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.320 | 0.149 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".