Bibliographic record
Abstract
ummer 2002 was generally warm and dry, with the exception of the first half of Junethat turned out cool and wet in the South.Breeding success was presumed to be good, although negative impacts were locally expected in some adverse circumstances.For instance, major fires destroyed nearly 250,000 hectares of boreal forests north of Lake Saint-Jean and east of James Bay in early July.Although the impact on nesting birds cannot be assessed now, it remains possible that at least a certain proportion of the birds had enough time to replace their lost broods.An avian cholera outbreak on some islands of the St. Lawrence Estuary in June was responsible for the death of 6000 Common Eiders, mostly incubating females.According to authorities, it was the biggest outbreak of disease on Qu(•bec wildlife in 30 years, but overall the eider duck population was not at risk.The species is abundant in the estuary and the Gulf of St. Lawrence and has rebounded from large outbreaks of disease in the past.On a more encouraging note, surveys conducted by the Canadian X•rfidlife Service in the southern James Bay region produced remarkable finds.Not only this area is already well known as a major stopover for migrating shorebirds and waterfowl, but it also appears to be an important and highly productive breeding ground for many species of special concern.Various reports from the Nunavik region of Quebec by biologists of the Canadian X•rfidlife Service and by others also contributed new insights into the Regional distribution of some species.These efforts led to the discovery of two new breeding species for the Region: the Pectoral Sandpiper and the Dunlin.A third species, the Orchard Oriole, was also found nesting in the southern part of the Region for the first time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.672 | 0.242 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".