MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7149306379 · doi:10.71465/ajbe1593

The Promise of Artificial Intelligence in Personalized Healthcare Systems

2025· article· W7149306379 on OpenAlexaff
Dr. Olivia Moore, Dr. Samuel Carter

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Biomedical Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformative learningHealth carePersonalized medicineField (mathematics)Applications of artificial intelligencePrecision medicineHealthcare system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds transformative potential in the field of healthcare, especially in the development of personalized healthcare systems. By leveraging vast amounts of patient data, AI can provide tailored healthcare solutions, improve diagnostic accuracy, and optimize treatment plans for individuals. This article explores the role of AI in personalized healthcare, focusing on predictive analytics, machine learning models, and data-driven decision-making. We discuss the various AI techniques applied in personalized medicine, their impact on patient care, and the challenges associated with integrating AI into clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.803

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Biomedical EngineeringSame topicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationFrench-language works237,207