MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7149482904 · doi:10.71465/ajbe416

Biomedical Engineering in the Management of Neurological Disorders

2022· article· W7149482904 on OpenAlexaff
Dr. Lucas Moore, Rachel C. Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Biomedical Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeural engineeringDeep brain stimulationHealth carePatient careBiomedical technologyNeuroimagingTissue engineeringNeural tissue engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neurological disorders, including conditions such as Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, and Alzheimer’s disease, pose significant challenges to both patients and healthcare providers. Biomedical engineering plays a crucial role in the management of these disorders by developing advanced technologies that aid in diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation. This article reviews the contributions of biomedical engineering to the management of neurological disorders, including the development of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), neuroprosthetics, deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems, and diagnostic imaging techniques. The article also highlights emerging trends in neuroengineering and the future potential for biomedical engineering to revolutionize neurological care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Biomedical EngineeringSame topicNeurological disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207