MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7151040434 · doi:10.2196/71224

"A Novel Convolutional Neural Network-Based Algorithm for Heart Rate Measurement from Ballistocardiography Signals in Diverse Clinical Settings" (Preprint)

2025· article· en· W7151040434 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kumar Chokalingam, Muthukumarasamy Saravanan, Ashish Kaushal, Srishti Rao, Inam Ur Rahman, Ashwathi Nambiar, Mudit Dandwate, Ravi Mahajan, Kunal Sarkar, Gaurav Parchani

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Cardio · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBallistocardiographyPattern recognition (psychology)Convolutional neural networkHeart rateMeasure (data warehouse)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Continuous vital sign monitoring ensures early detection, prevents intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and improves patient outcomes. Continuous heart rate (HR) monitoring methods often require direct skin contact, which can lead to patient discomfort. The rising popularity of ballistocardiography (BCG) offers a promising, noncontact solution for continuous vital sign monitoring with improved patient comfort. Objective: This study aims to develop and validate a novel HR measurement algorithm leveraging convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and BCG signals for accurate, noncontact, and continuous HR monitoring. By integrating time-domain peak detection with short-time Fourier transform and CNN models, the proposed approach seeks to enhance HR measurement accuracy across diverse health care settings. The study follows the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s Good Machine Learning Practice guidelines and evaluates the algorithm's robustness, generalizability, and clinical applicability through extensive testing on a diverse dataset, ensuring improved patient comfort and early detection of clinical deterioration. Methods: The proposed algorithm combines time-domain peak detection with short-time Fourier transform and CNNs to enhance HR measurement from BCG signals. The CNN model developed was trained on 129,976 data points from 373 participants (HR range: 36-230 bpm), including ICU patients, and was tuned on 75,970 data points from 192 participants (HR range: 46-169 bpm), with HR obtained from clinical-grade electrocardiography devices to improve generalizability. The algorithm was tested on 70,211 data points from 205 participants, including ICU patients, across 5 independent studies to demonstrate robust performance against diverse settings, demographics, and comorbidities. The methodology is in compliance with the FDA's Good Machine Learning Practice for Medical Device Development: Guiding Principles. Results: The algorithm achieved a mean absolute error of under 3 bpm and a detection rate exceeding 80%, underscoring its robustness. The Bland-Altman analysis indicates high accuracy with a minimal bias of 0.25 and limits of agreement within 8.59 bpm. Additionally, the Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.97 from the Deming regression further demonstrates strong alignment with reference HR measurements, reinforcing its precision and reliability for clinical applications. Conclusions: This CNN-based algorithm presents a robust solution for contactless HR monitoring, addressing the limitations of prior methods in noise management and adaptability. Its demonstrated accuracy, particularly in real-world, noisy clinical environments, highlights its potential for broad application in patient monitoring and improved comfort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJMIR CardioSame topicNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringFrench-language works237,207