MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Geospatial mapping of lead and mercury contamination hotspots in tropical coastal sediments and their correlation with reproductive impairment in commercially harvested bivalves and finfish

2021· article· W7151548951 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rajesh Kumar Dubey

Bibliographic record

VenueZoological and Entomological Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy metals in environment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMercury (programming language)ContaminationHydrology (agriculture)FloodplainMangroveSedimentGeospatial analysisWetlandDrainage basinWater quality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Centuries of religious, agricultural, and industrial activity along the Ganga at Varanasi have deposited metals in riverbed and floodplain sediments, yet spatial mapping of these deposits and their biological consequences remained incomplete before 2012. This research combined geospatial analysis of lead (Pb) and mercury (Hg) in sediments with reproductive health assessment of freshwater bivalves (Lamellidens marginalis) and commercially harvested finfish (Labeo rohita) at five stations along a 24-km stretch of the Ganga near Varanasi during January to December 2009. Sediment samples were collected monthly from surficial deposits (top 10 cm) at each station and analysed by cold-vapour atomic absorption spectrophotometry (Hg) and flame AAS (Pb). Spatial interpolation was performed using inverse-distance weighting in a geographic information system to generate contamination hotspot maps. Lead concentrations ranged from 21.6 mg/kg dry weight at the upstream reference station during the monsoon to 94.3 mg/kg at the industrial-zone station during the pre-monsoon, exceeding the Canadian Interim Sediment Quality Guideline (ISQG) of 50 mg/kg at three of five stations for at least part of the year. Mercury ranged from 32 µg/kg to 189 µg/kg, surpassing the ISQG of 150 µg/kg at the industrial station during three pre-monsoon months. Geospatial maps identified a persistent contamination hotspot centred on the industrial outfall zone that expanded laterally into adjoining floodplain soils during the monsoon recession. Gonadosomatic Index (GSI) in L. marginalis at the most contaminated station (pre-monsoon mean: 7.3%) was 43% lower than at the reference station (12.8%), and histological examination of gonadal tissue revealed elevated rates of oocyte atresia (38.7% vs. 11.4%) and spermatogenic arrest. In L. rohita, GSI declined from 8.4% at the reference station to 3.4% at the industrial station, and the proportion of females at advanced maturity stages fell from 62% to 23%. Sediment Pb correlated negatively with bivalve GSI (r = -0.89, p<0.001) and sediment Hg correlated negatively with finfish GSI (r = -0.92, p<0.001). These results map, for the first time in this river segment, the spatial extent of metal contamination and connect it directly to reproductive impairment in organisms that support both ecological function and local livelihoods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZoological and Entomological Letters→Same topicHeavy metals in environment→French-language works237,207→