Bibliographic record
Abstract
Donny, Josh, Sasha, Sophia, and Star, eds., Earth First! 27, no. 6 (1 September 2007). Republished by the Environment & Society Portal, Multimedia Library. http://www.environmentandsociety.org/node/7246. FEATURES • Defending the Wild in the Land of Fire and Ice Saving Iceland takes Action • What Goes Around Comes Around Day of Action Against 1-69 • Brazil’s Landless Workers’ Movement • Anti-Nuclear Activist Murdered in Siberia • Discussions and Diving With Wingnuts 2007 EF! Rendezvous Review • Trans’ and Wimmin’s Action Camp 2007 Review • Answering the Call of the Wild Earth 2007 Wild Earth Gathering Review • Rising Tide Tour Reportback • Rising Tide Visits Pine Ridge • The Weak Points of Caterpillar A Guide to Heavy Machinery • The Journal’s Anti-Oppression Policy • EF! Defeats NATO in the Netherlands • Forest Defense in Oaxaca • The Environmental Impacts of the G8 Protests • Asheville Cyclists Protest the G8 • Gazing After the G8A View From the Black Bloc • Assembly of First Nations Day of Action Reclaiming Land Rights in Canada • EF! Weekly World News Get the Real Scoop • Global Waming will Release the Blob • Peak Denial Using Forests for Biofuel • The Return of Nature Review of A World Without Us • A Beacon in the Darkness: The Animal Liberation Movement Review of From Dusk ‘til Dawn • Burning in the Night Review of Earth Liberation Front: 1997-2002 • Awakening From the Nightmare of Zoos Review of Thought to Exist in the Wild • Phoenix From the Flames The First Epestle From Sade and Exile • Symbolic Struggle or Meaningful Change? • An Inside Look at Women’s Prisons • Miffed by Miffy What do you get when you fuse the most brutal landowners of the Global South with some of the most powerful corporations of the North […]? You get transnational corporations that reap billions of dollars in profits, […] the devastation of Brazil’s precious ecosystems, and a people who inherit polluted aquifers, exhausted soils and genetically contaminated agricultural systems. — Juan Reardon The Rachel Carson Center’s Environment & Society Portal makes archival materials openly accessible for purposes of research and education. Views expressed in these materials do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of the Rachel Carson Center or its partners.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.588 | 0.561 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".