MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7151618000 · doi:10.33579/rkr.v6i2.4520

Analisa Hirarki Klaster Perkotaan Di Wilayah Kabupaten Semarang

2024· article· W7151618000 on OpenAlexaff
Abdullah Abdullah, Iwan Priyoga

Bibliographic record

VenueREKA RUANG · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationMaster planStatistical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kabupaten Semarang memiliki 19 wilayah kecamatan dengan pertumbuhan wilayah yang tidak sama. Berdasarkan nilai PDRB pada tahun 2015, terdapat Enam kecamatan dengan nilai Poduk Domestik Regional Bruto terbesar diatas satu triliun rupiah, yaitu Kecamatan Bawen, Kecamatan Ungaran timur, Kecamatan Ungaran Barat, Kecamatan Bergas, Kecamatan Pringapus, dan Kecamatan Ambarawa. Pada masing-masing kecamatan itu memiliki wilayah perkotaan dengan tingkat pengaruh yang berbeda. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengidentifikasi klaster-klaster perkotaan yang terbentuk di lima kecamatan yang menjadi objek pembahasan dan memberikan penilaian wilayah perkotaan mana yang memiliki pengaruh paling besar. Metode yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kuantitatif. Pengumpulan data sekunder dilakukan dengan teknik dokumentasi, yaitu mencatat dan mempelajari data-data statistik yang berhubungan erat dengan permasalahan yang dibahas. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa klister-klaster di Kecamatan Ambarawa memiliki pengaruh yang paling besar, sedangkan klister perkotaan di Kecamatan Bawen memiliki pengaruh yang paling kecil di antara lima kecamatan yang menjadi objek studi. Studi ini diharapkan dapat menjadi masukkan kepada pemerintah daerah Kabupaten Semarang untuk menjadikan Ambarawa sebagai pusat pengembangan kota di Wilayah Kabupaten Semarang.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueREKA RUANGSame topicEconomic Growth and Fiscal PoliciesFrench-language works237,207