The eveluation the quality of life of patients with stable angina pectoris
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY Aim: To evaluate the quality of life of patients with stable angina pectoris, the decrease of physical load tolerance by them and influence of prevention measures for their quality of life. Methods of the study: The following research methods were used for the study: questioning of patients, interview method, method of document analysis, statistical data processing. The study sample consisted of 93 investigated persons. All investigated persons were divided into two groups: the first group included patients with stable angina pectoris of functional classes III-IV; the second group comprised the investigated with stable angina pectoris of funktional classes I-II (according to the classification of the Canadian Heart Association). Findings: Very limited physical activity was found in 14,6 % of patients of the investigated group, moderately limited in 29,2 %, partially limited in 39,5 %, litlle limited in 12,5 % and unlimited in 4,2% of patients of the investigated group. After receiving findings of the study we could state that physical activity was more or less limited in more than 95 % of patients with AP (of functional slasses III-IV). The number of patients of the compared group distributed in the following way by the abovementioned ranges: very limited physical activity was in case of 11,1% of patients, moderately limited in 40 %, partially limited in 31,1 %, little limited in 11,1 %, unlimited in 6,7 % of patients of the compared groups. After getting to know about their stable angina pectoris 75 % of patients of the first group and 66,7% of patients of the second group changed their lifestyles. By means of analysis and evaluation of the quality of life by grade, we determined that quality of life of 29,6 % of patients of the investigated group was very poor, of 18,6 % poor, of 31,1 % satisfaktory, of 18,6 % good and of 2,1 % very good. Contrarily to the investigated group the quality of life was not evaluated as very poor or poor for any patient of the compared group. The quality of life of 6,7 % of patients of the compared group was evaluated as satisfactory, of 31,1 % as good and of 62,2 % as very good. Conclusions: After assessment of physical activity of both groups we could state that physical activity of the first group was more limited as compared to the second. Capacity to work and to occupy oneself with leisure activities one was fond of was more limited in case of patients with graver forms of angina pectoris. Prevention measures were equally important for the investigated persons of both groups, independently of seriousness of the disease or age of the patient. The investigated persons who changed their lifestyle after getting to know about their disease experienced episodes of pectoral pain less frequently. After evaluation of findings of the whole study we determined that quality of life of the investigated of the first group was poorer in comparison with the second group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".