Bibliographic record
Abstract
cite Daniel Mornet, qui n'a pas craint d'crire qu'Amphitryon tait une "pice-flagornerie, ou, si l'on songe toutes les flagorneries du temps, une pice de courtisan" (Molire, [Paris: Boivin, 1943], 145-146) .La thse de la pice de courtisan a d'abord t avance par Roederer, suivi par des critiques comme Jacques Truchet, Ren Jasinski, Antoine Adam, Georges Couton. 2 Le dossier rassembl par George Couton prouve bien que Molire devait savoir que Louis XIV s'intressait Mme de Montespan et que, connaissant la cour, il devait savoir aussi qu'il pouvait faire allusion cette intrigue sans crer de scandale.Mail il ne suffit pas de prouver qu'il pouvait le faire pour prouver qu'il l'a effectivement fait (Pommier 214).3 La Lettre sur la comdie de l'imposteur parat, sans nom d'auteur, sans lieu et sans nom d'imprimeur, quelques jours aprs l'interdiction, par les autorits civiles et religieuses, de la Comdie de l'imposteur, reprsente le 4 aot 1667.Ce texte, longtemps considr comme une riposte de Molire, a t attribu par Robert Mc Bride La Mothe Le Vayer
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".