MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7153151847 · doi:10.3917/rsc.1704.0871a

John Winterdyk (dir.), Pioneers in canadian criminology . Rock’s Mills Press, Oakville (Ontario), 2017, 293 pages

2017· article· fr· W7153151847 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
François Dieu

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de science criminelle et de droit pénal comparé · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDecadence, Literature, and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
Keywordsnot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RésuméTiraillé entre des objectifs contradictoires, le droit pénal des mineurs a perdu, depuis le début des années 2000, quelque peu de sa cohérence. Le manque d'approche globale du droit pénal dans son ensemble est une des causes de ce phénomène qui conduit à punir plus sévèrement les mineurs que les majeurs. Cette étude plaide en faveur d'une meilleure coordination du droit spécifique avec le droit commun afin de maintenir une égalité des mineurs et des majeurs devant la loi pénale. Si certaines incohérences semblent avoir déjà trouvé une résolution, d'autres sont encore en souffrance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de science criminelle et de droit pénal comparéSame topicDecadence, Literature, and SocietyFrench-language works237,207