Bibliographic record
Abstract
Las relaciones paradiplomáticas entre Quebec y México han tenido un impacto significativo en el ámbito económico, educativo y cultural ya que fomentan una dinámica colaborativa que funge como eje de cooperación descentralizada entre ambas naciones. Los autores rastrean al t-mec como pieza clave en el mutuo desarrollo e innovación, destacando sectores como el aeroespacial, de transporte, energía y turismo. Además, la presencia continua de programas que fomenten y enriquezcan el aprendizaje intercultural con el fin de crear comunidades transnacionales. Del mismo modo, se han promovido iniciativas en temas relacionados con la investigación y la cultura orientadas a la juventud, con perspectiva de igualdad de género y desarrollo sustentable. Estos intercambios sientan las bases para una colaboración más estrecha a futuro puesto que es necesario mantener un panorama estratégico que permita aprovechar las nuevas tecnologías en el marco de una creciente economía digital.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".