Bibliographic record
Abstract
As Tl[tI;SE pages go to press we are ill receipt, through the kindness of the publishers, of Miss Maria R. Audubon's 'Audubon and his Journals.'l A hasty examination of these snmptuonslyprinted volnines is sufficient to show that MissAndubon has presented ns with a work of fascinating interest to all ornithologists and bird-lovers and one which must also appeal strolgly to the sympathies of the general reader.The story of his romantic life, told briefly in the first volume, is of absorbi]g interest.Following this are the Enropeau, Labrador, and Missouri River 'Journals,' and the ' Episodes,' the latter for the first time collectively reprinted from the first three volume5 of the 'Ornithological Biographies.'The illnstrationsincludea dozen portraits of Audubon, most of them heretofore unpnblished, and also portraits of his xvife, and his sous, John and Victor.There are alsoviexvs of his mill in Kentucky and of his home mansions in Pennsylvania, besides various cmnp scenes and previously unpublished sketches of birds, including a pencil sketch of Townsend's Bnnting.The geographical and zoSlog-ical annotations by Dr. Coues add further interest to the work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".