Bibliographic record
Abstract
A Y•AR ago I published a preliminary list of the birds of Leon County, Florida,' which comprised the species I had then observed, with notes of such facts connected with them as seemed of special interest.As subsequent observations, besides materially extending this list, have added information concerning the birds already listed, it seems desirable to publish a supplementary article on the birds of the county.Most of the information here recorded was gathered in the fall of 1904 during early morning excursions through McDougall's pasture and to a thickly wooded hill a quarter of a mile from the city limits, which I have designated in my journals, and likewise do here, as 'Lively's woods,' from the name of the owner.Birds found here are individually and specifically so numerous that a brief description of the locality may be interesting.McDoug•ll's pasture, ornithologically the most productive limited area I have ever seen, covers about sixty acres.A small cypress swamp, with its marshes, occupies the center, from which, on the eastern and western sides gradually rises a symmetrical, grass-carpeted hill, that on the western reaching its highest elevation in the back yard of the owners of the pasture, just on the line that marks the eastern limits of Tallahassee.The eastern one terminates (and the country thence assumes a level condition) at the western edge of Lively's woods.This woodland occupies an area of about tlfirteen acres and is composed largely of such trees as the live and water oaks, sweet gums, hickories, pines, magnolias, persimmons, and hollies, none of which attain any great size and the oaks are rather remarkable for their slenderness and the scarcity of their lower branches or twigs, the growth of which has developed principally at and near the top.Among the leaves and branches of these trees I found the migrating warblers very abundant and was surprised to note
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.060 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".