Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lesser Black-backed Gull on Long Island.--OnMarch 1, 1947, the writers, together with Richard Ryan of New York, observed an adult Lesser Black-backed Gull (Larus fuscus subsp.)standing upon the ice on the Hempstead Reservoir, Hempstead, L.I. Conditions under which the bird was observed were excellent.It was standing in a group of gulls with a Herring Gull immediately beside it and a Greater Black-backed Gull next to the latter.The difference in size between the two Black-backs was strikingly apparent.In addition, the mantle of the Lesser was much browner and a shade lighter than that of the Greater, and the difference in foot coloration was noticeable.The birds were observed and compared for a period of about fifteen minutes with a 33X scope.--PxLI,n,sB. STm AND Wri, xAx W. LurdNs, JR., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Barn Owl in Quebec.--OnSeptember 8, 1944, the Quebec Zoological Garden received a live specimen of an adult Barn Owl (Tyto alba pratincola) from Thefiord Mines, Megantic County.As I have not been able to find any published record of this species for the Province of Quebec, and moreover having secured three other unpublished records from reliable observers, I believe the following records warrant publication.The specimen brought to the Quebec Zoo was caught in a barn in the suburb of Thetford Mines, Megantic County, on September 3.The bird was in very weak condition and died a few hours after its arrival at the Zoo after which it was sent to the Quebec Provincial Museum.Reverend J. A. Bergeron of Nicolet Seminary, through personal correspondence, tells me that a Barn Owl was killed in 1936 at St. Flix-de-Kingsey, Nicolet County
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it