Bibliographic record
Abstract
A common winter visitor.My extreme dates are October 15, 1911, and April 20, 1912.69.Seiurus mota½illa.LOUtStANAWATER TSRUSS.--Notcommon.I have seen it here on October 29, 1911, and again on February 11 and 18, 1912 --a total of three records.70.Oporornis formosa.KENTUCKY WARBLER.--Not a common visitor, but perhaps more winter here than one would think from the number seen.They walk about in the heavy damp jungle, calling with the same unmistakable metallic chirp as they do in their breeding haunts.My earliest record is February 22 and the last is March 24, 1912.71.Oporornis philadelphia.MOUR•tNG WARBLEn.--Beingunable to accurately distinguish between this species and tolmei in the field, i can record with certainty, only two dates for this bird.One male taken at Gatfin on April 7 and another on April 28, 1912.It (or tolmei) is not rare in October and November and again throughout April.72.Wilsonia canadensis.CANADIAN WARBLER.--I have sccn but one bird of this species.A male taken at Gatfin on April 28, 1912.73.Setophaga ruticilla.REDSTART.--Notuncommon at times.My earliest record is October 1, 1911, and the last is March 31.The longest interval without a record is January i to 23. 74.Dumetella carolinensis.CATBIRD.--OnFebruary 22, 1911, I saw three birds of this species near Gatfin, but have seen it on no other occasion.GENERAL NOTES.Holbcell's Grebe (Colymbus holboelli) at Bedford, Mass.--Feb.15, 1913, Mr. William H. Simonds found a Holbcell's Grebe on the ice of Concord river.The bird was in good condition but apparently exhausted.It was brought to the village and identified and on the next day, the 16th, was carried back to the river bank and apparently there took care of itself and was thought to have been seen a day later in open water.--CUARLESW. JERKS, Bedford, Mass.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.388 | 0.126 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".