Bibliographic record
Abstract
the first from Washtenaw County) taken November 19, 1922, from a small flock by Walter Koelz, who donated it to the Museum of Zoology.Perisoreus c. canadensis.CANADA JA¾.--Barrows (1912), records the young of this species, but says there are no nesting records for the state.Mr. Walter Koelz took an immature bird September 1919 in Pickford Township.Chippewa County, and saw others.He was told by a resident that the species nested there.Scotiaptex c. cinerea.GREAT GRAY 0WL.--Barrows (1912) records a few taken in the Upper Peninsula, but only one for the Lower Peninsula.I wish to add a record for Elk Rapids, taken in 1893, and a fine male, sent me in the flesh by W. B. Purdy, taken at/-Iillman, Montmorency County, November 25, 1922.--NobMAwr A. WOOD, Ann Arbor, Mich.Some 1922 Records of Birds of the Madison, Wisconsin, Territory.1. Colymbus holboelli.I-•OLBOELL'S GREBE.--0nespecimen observed April 28. 2. Sterna caspia.CASr•AN TERN.--Two individual observed May 17. 3. Sterna paradisaea.ARCTIC TERN.--TWO birds closely studied while sitting, May 15. 4. Chaulelasmus streperus.GADWALL.--Fourspecimens seen October 19.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".