MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7153680293

Third Record of Black-chinned Hummingbird, Archilochus Alexandri, in Oregon

2024· article· W7153680293 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Berton M. Bailey

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNest (protein structural motif)Table (database)CapeAdult malePredationMorning
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

General Notes toot.1934).The adult male did not appear until 8:00 p.m. on April 3, when the adult female called from the nest ledge and was answered by the adult male from a nearby elm tree.The table shows that most of the food items brought to the nest ledge were decapitated, especially the larger forms.The adult owl would take the food from the reserve supply to the nest where it would be eaten at intervals during the day and night.For example, at 5:00 p.m. on March 24 there were three Bronzed Grackles on the nest ledge with one pigeon in the nest; all four birds were decapitated.By 3:45 p.m. the next day only one Bronzed Grackle remained outside the center window; but outside the west window was the wing, rump, tail and leg of a Coot.Then at 8:45 a.m. on March 29, a rabbit and one Pied-billed Grebe, both headless, were outside the center window.One wing of the grebe was in the nest.That night it rained and the next morning all the food had been eaten.--Roo•RO. O[•s•r•D, 818 Alabama Street, Lawrence, Kansas.First Breeding Record of Black Swift, Nephoecetes n. borealis, in Colorado.--The Northern Black Swift, has been seen in Colorado on various occasions during the last 70 years.J.M. Drew collected ten individuals in 1881-1882 in San Juan County (Bull.Nutt.Orn.Club, 1881: 140, and 1882: 182).Widmarm (Auk, 28: 313, 1911) saw five in July over Glacier Meadow.Other reports have placed them variously at the towns of Trinidad, Montrose, and in Huerfano County.Bailey and Niedrach of the Denver Museum of Natural History told us of seeing them in San Juan County some years ago, and with the approval and assistance of these two gentlemen, we undertook to discover the nesting place of these birds.On July 21, 1949, we found a colony of approximately eight pairs nesting in a gorge in the San Juan mountains, adjacent to a 150-foot waterfall.This colony proved to be inaccessible without the use of elaborate mountaineering equipment.Three days later we found a more accessible colony 15 miles away.This colony was also in a gorge, adjacent to a series of waterfalls, and apparently consisted of six or seven pairs.Both sites were located in the upper Canadian Zone, elose to 10,000 feet, the terrain being typical of the rugged precipitous San Juan mountains.At the latter site, the falls had cut through the ancient igneous rock to a depth of 40 feet at several places.The nest we were able to reach was located 25 feet above a deep pool at the base of the largest falls in a cavity 10 inches high, 12 inches wide and 8 inches deep.The sun never shone on the nest.We noticed that the swifts chose nesting sites close to falling water, most of them being subjected to a continuous spray.However, one nest was observed at least 20 feet from the nearest water and was quite dry.The nests are constructed of mud and moss, the moss continuing to grow on the nest.The males spend most of the day foraging far from the nesting area, returning at infrequent intervals, while the females incubate.The females occasionally leave their nests for short periods of time for the purpose of feeding.On July 27, 1949, we photographed and collected a nest and its single egg, the first to be taken in Colorado and the female (DMNH 25551).The nest weighed 1.5 lbs.and the egg, 5.5 grams.All are now in the museum collection.--Ow•N A.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)→Same topicAvian ecology and behavior→French-language works237,207→