Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent Literature.LOct."multitude" of Ruby-throated Hummingbirds migrating together Across the sky while the Rose-breasted Grosbeak whose "rose stain" was entirely lost in the autumn had more likely never yet acquired it.--W.S. Taverner's 'Birds of Eastern Canada.'•--Asecond edition of this wluable work is before us, which presents a v•ery creditable appearance with its excellently printed letter press and attractive plates from color 'sketches by/tennessey.It will prove of inestimable wlue in providing those interested in the avifauna of eastern Canada, with just the information they desire and should be instrumental in developing many young bird-lover into an ornithologist.We have fully reviewed the first edition so that the generMly excellent character and scope of the work is already familiar to our re•ders.From a purely technical standpoint we fM1 to grasp the author's obicct in granting distinctive headings to certain genera, while others are lumped together, as for instance "Genus Thryothorus" and "Genus Thryomanes" but "Genera Cistothorus and Telmatodyles."If he does not regard the last two as separable, why does he not live up to his convictions and unite them instead of adopting this misleading and inconsistent practice?English names for gcner• are also rather unfortunate and can prove of little use: i.e. "Ground Warblers for a group includi•ng the Chat; "Grosbeaks" for the Rose-breast but "Blue Grosbeaks" for Guiraca; and "Yellow-bellied Flycatchers" for all the Empidonaces.It is dif•cult also to see why some of these names should be singular and others plural.Errors in the systematic index still place almost all the Sparrows in the genus Acanthis; the P•rula and Worm-e•ting W•rblers in Vermivora, etc. Thes• are purely technical points, however, and will not detract from the gre•t usefulness of Mr. Taverner's book.It seems to us, however, t.hat in a popular work some definite and generally accepted scheme of arrangement should be rigidly adhered to; such publications are hardly the place for exploiting original schemes.We notice incidentally that Linnodromus is consistently mispelled.--W.S. Swarth on 'Birds and Mammals of the Stikine River Region.This important contribution covering Mr. Sw•rth's explorations in British Columbia and Alaska, May to September 1919, has been prepared with the care and thoroughness that characterize all of his public'ations.The collection made by the author and his associate Mr. Joseph Dixon, comprised 534 ma•nmals and 638 birds as well as other material, including • Birds of Eastern Canada (Second Edition).By P. A. Taverner.Memoir 104, No. 3, Biological Series.Dept. of Mus.Geol.Survey, Canada.Ottawa, 1922, pp.i-iv•-l-290 with 50 colored plates (included in pagination).• Bir •ds and Mammals of the stikine River Region of Northern British Columbia and South-eastern Alaska.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.073 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".