Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent Lite/atztre.[Auk [.Jan. between Eagle and Circle and in the mountains west of Eagle near the sources of Mission Creek."In the early part of the summer of 1904 a trip was made into the Ogilvie Range northwest of Dawson, Yukon Territow, "to supplement the work done in 1903 in the mountains lying on the opposite side of the Yukon River, in Alaska."The trip to this latter region involved considerable expense, and for this reason had been necessarily deferred.In 1904 it was made possible through the eo6peration of Mr. Charles Sheldon of New York, who "most generously bore practically the entire expense of tim trip."In 1903 Mr. Osgood was aeeompanicd by Mr. N. ttollister, and in 1906 by Mr. Charles Shddon and Mr. Carl Rungius.The report is divided into three parts, each treating of a (listinet area; the three areas, however, are contiguous and biologically, as welt as geographically, etosety related.The physiographic and biological features of each are described, followed by extensively annotated lists of the mmnmals and birds observe or collected in each area.Three maps indicate the routes traveled, and the geographic relations of the localities visited.The fore' half-tone plates consist of eight illustrations, from photog•'aphs, of as many characteristic localities in the areas visited.The ornithological observations are given, as already stated, in the form of annotated lists of the species met with.The ' Birds of East Central Alaska' (pp.33-44) number 76 species; those of the "Ogilvie Range" list (pp.58-65), 43 species; those of the "Mae•nitlan Region" (pp.84-92), 55 spedes.In preparing the Alaska list Mr. Osgood utilized Mr. N. Hollister's notes, and had opportunity also to examine specimens of some 25 additional species obtained by other collectors in this region, as mentioned in the introductory paragraph to this list, which contains extended notes on the habits of the Western Solira W Sandpiper, and a description of its newly hatched young.The 'Ogitvie Range' and 'Macmillan River' lists, though numbering fewer species, include several not recorded in the 'East Central Alaska' list.The observations here placed on record add greatly to our knowledge of the ranges and relative abundance of the birds and mammals of these regions, which were to a large extent previously unknown biologically.It is to be noted, however, that a munber of species of both birds and mammals are formally included in the lists that were neither collected nor observed, but simply for the reason that from their known distribution they undoubtedly must occm' in the areas here considered.While incidental mention of such species is desirable, it is hardly consistent with modern methods to include them in a formal manner with species "collected or observed."--J.A. A. Seton on the Mammals and Birds of Manitoba.--Thisbrochure • of 48 pages consists of annotated lists of the mammals and birds of the Prov-• Fauna of Manitoba.(Maxnmals and Birds).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.163 | 0.043 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".