Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Western Martin and the California Cuckoo at Escortdido, Calif.--On June •I, x896, three or four pairs of black, swallow-like hirds were seen flying swiftly about, and were seen to alight occasionally upon the caves of the college huildingof that place.On June •2 I was fortunate enough to secure an adult female, which proved to be subls ,Sesperia.This bird had a soft shelled egg in her ovidnct.Angust 2o, while out hnnting for a Road-ruuner, 1 saw a bird 1hat was new tome.It seemed very tame and had a long tail, similar to a Dove, but the flight was quite slow and resembled that of a Sparroxv 1Iawk.It proved to be a fine male Cocqvzus amert¾(t•tts occidentalis and measured as follows: Length, abont •2.5o inches; wing, 7.00; tail, 6.00; hill Loo.Iris hazel.This specimen was taken among sumac hushes on a foothill.On Aug. 22 another bird ot the same species was noted.--J.5LxuRm• llaTCn, Escondido, Caltf Bird Notes from Toronto, Canada.•Somateriaspectabilis.KING Em•R.•Nov.•8, •895, I took an adult male of this species inthemost perfect mature plmnage I have ever seen.The bird was alone and very wild.hnmature birds of this species are not uncommon late in the autumn on Lake Ontario, but adult birds are extremely rare.Porzana noveboracensis.YELLO•V RalL.•Sept.•2, •894, I took a fernale in the marshes east of Toronto, and a male at the same place, Sept. 4, •89.g; also a specimen on Oct. 3, and still another on Oct. •5, of the I have never succeeded in finding this species in the spring, nor in summer before the month of August.Cistothorus stellaris.•IIORT-BILLEI) •'IARSH WREN,• On August 29, •89•, I found and secured an adult female of this species in an old field north of Toronto, the bird was a long distance from any marsh or water.On June 7, •895, I captured an adult male in a wet meadow east of Toronto.There were no rushes near this place bnt the grass was very rank.•C.W. NASH, Toronto, Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".