MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7153684629

Chuck-will's-widow and Mockingbird Iu Ontario

2024· article· W7153684629 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
James H. Fleming

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature, Film, and Journalism Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
Keywordsnot available
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

also went by in open order, were mostly gathered in masses containing from twenty to four hundred birds or more each.They swept along very rapidly.Their largest masses suggested scudd/ng clouds and were decidedly impressive.The Robins moved a good deal more slowly.Both species flew at altitudes vary/ng from twenty to one hundred yards from the ground, and most of the birds passed within a distance of one hundred and fifty yards from my window,--none, I think, farther away than about an eighth of a mile.At ten minutes past ten o'clock I was obliged to take up sonhe work which was awaiting me.But I frequently looked out of the window after that hour, and could detect no diminution in the number of passing birds until after one o'clock r. 5I.All the afternoon they flew by in gradually diminishin• numbers, a good many Robins tarrying for brief periods in the fields before my window.Throu'ghout the day the direction of the flight was the sanhe, and there was practically no retrograding: altogether I saw less than a hundred birds coming back, all Robins.I found that I had counted a total of twenty thousand four hundred birds in the hour and a half, at least fourteen thousand of which were Cedar-birds.These figures are much inside the mark.Between ten minutes past ten A.M. and one o'clock r. 5x.twice the number of birds that I had previously counted must have gone by.A multitude had pgssed before I began counting.Ten thousand, at the lowest estimate possible, must have followed during the remainder of the afternoon.In the course of the day, therefore, many more than sixty thousand birds passed over that part of Camden which I overlooked.I believe that seventy-five thousand --fifty thousand Cedar-birds --would be too low an estimate.The path of the flight also extended south of my position at the window.I cannot say how far it extended, and I can offer no estimate of the number of birds which passed on that side.As usual, Robins had this year become more common in and about the town with the approach of February, but there had been no indication of any massing for this flight.Cedar-birds had been common throughout the previous months of the winter.I had never seen them in large numbers, however, except on February 3 --the day before the flight --when I found sonhe five hundredof them restlessly flying about a near by swamp.They all came together here at times in a dense mass, only to break up again into comparatively small parties.The two species were numerous in the vicinity for weeks thereafter.Still it was plain that the great majority of the host which I had seen had passed on.While at Camden during the winters of 1903-4 and 1905-6, I witnessed nothing resembling this flight.--NATHANCLIFFORD BROWN, Portland, Maine.Chuck-will's-widow and Mockiugbird iu Ontario.--CHUCK-]VILL'S-W•DOW,Antrosto•nus caroline•sis.--Itook a male of this species

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0290.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)Same topicLiterature, Film, and Journalism AnalysisFrench-language works237,207