Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this ii2-page book, Mr. Storer presents an analysis of bird flight and the modification of form for flight.In 172 illustrations, mostly enlargements from his motion pictures, he illustrates most of the points covered by the text."The book is recommended reading for every ornithologist."Harvey I. Fisher in 'THE Aunt' "A thorough analysis of the remarkable adaptation of birds to flight."'CANADIAN NATURE' "... attractive, interesting, and . . .presents sound physical explanations of many of the problems surrounding bird flight.Both the author and [publisher] are to be highly commended for this contribution to avian literature."Robert T. Orr in 'PACIFIC DISCOVERY' "It is a valuable addition to the only too slender library on bird flight and is in several respects the best of them."Charles H. Blake in 'BULL.MASS.AUDUBON SOC."Tout le contenu est de premier ordre."Y. Rocard in 'LA REvuE SCIENTIFIQUE' Price $2.50 postpaid in the United States Walkinshaw's 'SANDHILL CRANES' now ready.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.939 | 0.933 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".