MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7153688357

Recent Literature

2024· article· W7153688357 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
The Auk

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubspeciesField (mathematics)West coastSexual dimorphismLife history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Natural History and Differentiation in the Yellow-bellied Sapsucker.-ThomasR. Howell.Condor, 54 (5): 237-282, 7 figs., 1952.--Thefour generally recognized subspecies of Spkyrapicus varius constitute a fascinating example of arian evolution.Their complex relationships put to the test some of our modern criteria of species and subspecies.The ranges are almost wholly complementary: S. v. varius breeds across much of the northeastern United States and southern and western Canada; S. v. nuckalis is the bird of the Rocky Mountains, and ranges west to the Cascades; S. v. daggetti is confined principally to the Sierra Nevada, northern California, and adjacent areas; and S. v. tuber inhabits the Pacific Northwest.Most features of their life histories seem to be identical.Yet the migratory tendency is strongly developed in S. v. var•us, progressively less so in nucb.al•s and daggctt• respectively, and practically absent in tuber.Sexual dimorphism diminishes in a corresponding manner, disappearing altogether in tuber.The coloration varies so strikingly that the two western races, the "Red-breasted Sapsucker," have often been treated as a distinct species.More remarkable, in most of the limited areas where the breeding ranges of two races do come together, intermediates are far in the minority and interbreeding relatively uncommon.Only in the case of daggctti and tuber is a considerable zone of intergradation found.The author undertook as his doctoral thesis the investigation of this intensely interesting situation, by combined laboratory and field studies, placing special emphasis upon the critical point of the "breeding behavior of the races at the points of junction."His findings are most interestingly summarized in this paper, along with his conclusions concerning the present status and possible history of the several forms.Study of the pigmentation brings out the fact that the color differences, while probably genetic, are not as fundamental as they might first appear, the red carotenoid pigment being deposited chiefly at the tips of the feathers, and the red areas thus overlying to a large extent the black and white pattern beneath.But the characters are distinct enough to permit field recognition of the racial types and of intermediates, under favorable conditions even in juvenal plumage.The possibility of such recognition of living individuals enabled the author to make his greatest contribution: series of detailed nest observations in a number of selected areas of overlap.When Howell's original data are combined with the published records, and inferences made from the numbers and types of intermediates in collections, there are still wide gaps in our knowledge; but the picture of the interbreeding now becomes much clearer.Apparently there is considerable interbreeding where S. v. varius meets nuckalis (though this remains obscure), and where nuckalis meets daggetti; very little is to be found, however, in the areas where ruber comes east into central British Columbia to meet and separate the ranges of varius and nuckalis.The situation the author describes in some of these areas of contact is such that almost within a stone's throw may be found nesting pairs of each of two races, mixed pairs, and intermediates actually mated and raising young.A few miles to either side the breeding population, save for stray individuals, is made up exclusively of one race or the other.With such field data presented, and appropriately backed up by specimens, there can be little argument about the virtual allopatry or about the interfertility of these forms.The studies brought to light no differences in breeding behavior, and certain small variations in habitat preference are not always operative.By the widely accepted criteria here used, it is clear that the four populations can only be 218

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.571
Threshold uncertainty score0.814

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4290.297

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)→Same topicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies→French-language works237,207→