MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7153689115

Grinnell's Water-thrush in Colorado

2024· article· W7153689115 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
L. K. Robinson

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWarblerPlumageQuarter (Canadian coin)FeatherMountMile
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Third South Carolina Record for the Bay-breasted Warbler (Dendroica castanea).--Ishot on October 18, 1922, in a live oak hammock within a quarter of a mile of my house a very fine adult female of the Bay-breasted Warbler in winter plumage.When I first saw it among a lot of Redstarts (Setophaga ruticilla) I believed it to be a Black-poll Warbler (Dendroica striata) and, as I had not seen one of the latter birds in autumn for many years, I collected it.Upon reaching home I at once compared it with autumnal specimens of D. striata taken by me on Sullivan's Island, S.C., on October 6, 1887, as well as with a bird taken in my yard on November 14, 1906, and found after critical comparison that I had at last taken an undoubted Bay-breasted Warbler, which is the first example ever taken on the coast.Mr. Levererr Mills Loomis• secured at Chester two specimens in nuptial plumage of D. castanea, one on May 14 1887, and the other on May 5, 1888.--AnTaV•T. W•¾•., Mount Pleasant, S.C. ' Wintering of the Yellow Palm Warbler at Prattville, Ala.--EveryJanuary or December since 1913, eight or ten Yellow Palm Warblers can be found in roadside hedges some two miles east of this place though during February and March I have failed to find them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.696
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)Same topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207