Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purple Gallinule, Sabine's Gull, and other Rare Birds in Quebec.--About the middle of September last a young Purple Gallinule xvas shot on the beach of the St. Lawrence River abont two miles from the city of Quebec, and towards the first of October an adult Sabine's Gnll, in its fall phlmage, was also shot in the same place, by another sportsman.This bird and the preceding one, which are in my possession, are the first records of their presence in the Province of Quebec.In September last, a Meadowlark was captured in a field near a forest at Lorette, about six miles froin Quebec.This is the second occurrence of this bird here.Mr. J. Beetz, of Piastre Bay, Pointe aux Esquimaux, on the North Shore of the St. Lawrence, has recently sent me one adult specimen of the Mourning Dove shot by him the 23d of October last.We have had until now only five records of its presence in the Province; two near the city of Quebec, and three were recorded some years ago at Godbout, by Mr. N. Comeau, but none so far in the North.Mr. Beetz has also sent me one Ruby-throated Hmmningbird captured the 25th of September.--C.E. DIONN•, Quebec, Canada.Colorado Notes.--Geococcyxc•lifornianus.ROAn-•UNN•.--OnDecember 13, 1902, a boy living in University Park came into the shop of Mr. Hugo Todenwarth, then a Denver taxidermist, with a live Road-runner, which he said he had captured in their woodshed on the preceding day.University Park lies at the outskirts of Denver and adjacent to it are wide stretches of virgin prairie land.It seems probable that this bird had left tl•e open country on this winter's day to seek shelter among the abodes of man.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.671 | 0.319 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".