Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapid development of the information society, a certain dependence of people on the modern way of life and not keeping up with the constantly emerging new types of actual legal relations, outdated rules of law, the legal science in civil law regulation of information rights requires some changes, improvements, adding of the new terminology.One of these types of “new” information rights is the right of an individual to information regarding himself.In this research, the author analyzes the current legislation of Ukraine on the existing rights of individuals to information regarding themselves, does the comparative analysis of the conceptual legal framework of US, Canada, China, Australia and South Africa with national standards for the implementation and protection of individuals’ rights to information regarding themselves.The author defines a universal and generalizing concept of the right of an individual to information regarding himself, its characteristics as a subjective right that meet modern challenges and current requirements of legal science, form an idea of the content of this right, and draw conclusions about the need for careful and in-depth studying of this type of right and further implementation it in the legislation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".