Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ridgway on New Forms of Picid•e.• Mr. Ridgway here describes 11 new subspecies of American Woodpeckers and proposes a new genus, Belanosphyra, for the Melanerpes formicivorus group.Most of the subspecies are tropical, but the following are North American: (1) Colapres auratus borealis, the large form of the Canadian and Hudsonian zones, based wholly on size.(2) Colapres chrysoides mearns•, from "Arizona, extreme southeastern California and northern Lower California."C.c. brunnescens Anthony, omitted from the last A. O. U. Check-List, is also here reinstated.(3) Centurus uropygialis brewsteri, from southern Lower California.(4) Phlceotomus pileatus fioridan•s, from peninsular Florida.This, •vith the recently described P. p. picinus Bangs, • here also recognized, gives four subspecies of P. pileatus, and adds two to the last A. O. U. Check-List.All are based mainly on differences in size, and on the fact that corresponding subspecies are recognized for the corresponding areas in the Dryobates villosus and D. pubescens groups.--J. A. A. Oberholser on the Flycatchers of the Genera Hypothymis and CyanonymphaJ--The genus Hypoth•mis consists, as here recognized, of 4 species and 16 additional subspecies, of which 15 are subspecies of H. az•rea, for the most part insular forms; 11 of the subspecies are here first distinguished; most of the others were originally described as species.The group ranges from southern India to the Philippines, Sumatra, Borneo, Celebes, and Java, including the numerous smaller outlying islands.The new genus Cyanonympha consists of Hypothymis s•perciliaris and its subspecies samarer•sis, from the southern Phillippines.Keys are given to the species and subspecies, and tables of measurements of large series of specimens of many of the forms recognized.The monograph is based mainly on the collections made by Dr. W. L. Abbott, with other material in the U.S. National Museum, numbering altogether (including a few borrowed) 205 specimens.--J. A. A. Roberts's 'The Evening Grosbeak in Minnesota.'--Thispaper • was "prepared in its present form for publication in a 'Report on the Birds of Minnesota' in course of preparation by the Minnesota Natural • Diagnoses of Some New Forms of Picid•e.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.184 | 0.033 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".