List of the Rarer Birds Met with during the Spring of 1900 in the Immediate Vicinity of Toronto
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vol. XVlI"[ General 2Votes.•9oo .39 • earlier than the Olive-back and remains a week later, overlapping the Hermit by two or three days.September 27, iS93 , I shot a fine male Nelson's'Sparrow (Ammpdramus nelsoni).When first seen it was in company with a pair of Savanna Sparrows.Tt•e three were bathing in a little pool on a mud fiat.Later it flew to a reed top and commenced drying its feathers.This taking to a reed top was unusual and resulted ill its death.September 4, I899, !shot a Knot (Trin•a canutus) in immature plumage.It came straight in from the take and perched on a boulder about 300 feet from shore.']'his was near the town of Port Austin, Huron County.The local hunters called it a young 'Robin Plover' and did not consider it rare.In June, I899, my brother added the Black-throated Blue Warbler (Dendroica ccerulescens) to the list of birds breeding here.I have never personally observed this species in summer, but have found the Black and White (Mniotilta varia), Golden-winged (Iarelmintho•hila chryso•tera) and Cerulean (Denalto/ca ccerulea) to be common breeders, and am sure the Sycamore (D. dominlca albilora) breeds althongh no nests have yet been discovered.During ten years of careful field work I have seen the Cardinal Grosbeak ( Cardinalis cardlnalis) but twice and secured both specimens --female, November I, •897, and male, December 3, I899.--J.C•XiRg Woov, Detroit, 3Itcbig'an.List of the Rarer Birds met with during the Spring of i9oo in the Immediate Vicinity of Toronto.--Thefollowing list of the rarer birds which came under my personal observation wt•ile taking field notes during the past season in the immediate vicinity of Toronto may be of interest to other observers.May 8. Cape May Warbler (Dendroica tœffrina), • male seen." 9. ' ..... " " t male taken.• IO. • •' • • •* I Illale taken, " IL Prairie Warbler (Dendroica discolor), I male taken." i2.Orange-crowned Warbler (lYelminthos•hila celata), • •nale taken.'• •' • •{ • •{ I female taken." 13.Tennessee Warbler (tlelmintio•}ila •ereffrina), seen." 15.Black-poll •Varbler (Dendrolca slr&la', 3 males seen.'• x6.Kirtland's Warbler (Dendrolca •irtlandl), I •nale taken.'; •8.Cape May Warbler (Dendroica ti•rina), • male taken..... Black-poll 5Varbler (De•drolca •triata), males plentiful." •9.Orchard Oriole ([clerus •_•urius), z male taken." " " " " '• i female seen." 20.Cape May Warbler (Dendroica ti•rt'na), • male seen." 2I.Tennessee Warbler (hrelminthofihila/ereffrina), 2 seen.• 22. " • " " 25 or inore seen and three taken.Vol.XVlI"[ General 2Votes.•9oo .39 • earlier than the Olive-back and remains a week later, overlapping the Hermit by two or three days.September 27, iS93 , I shot a fine male Nelson's'Sparrow (Ammpdramus nelsoni).When first seen it was in company with a pair of Savanna Sparrows.Tt•e three were bathing in a little pool on a mud fiat.Later it flew to a reed top and commenced drying its feathers.This taking to a reed top was unusual and resulted ill its death.September 4, I899, !shot a Knot (Trin•a canutus) in immature plumage.It came straight in from the take and perched on a boulder about 300 feet from shore.']'his was near the town of Port Austin, Huron County.The local hunters called it a young 'Robin Plover' and did not consider it rare.Recent Literature.L0ct.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.108 | 0.030 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".