Bibliographic record
Abstract
Webster Road near the rear of the farm I met the first individual of this species (Canada Jay) that I had ever seen.He was not at all shy and I observed him for some time with my opera-glasses at a distance of about twenty feet.I also heard his song, which was quite pleasing and somewhat resembled that of the Catbird, though in this instance, at least, it was not so loud, apparently being uttered with closed bill.Besides this he uttered a disagreeable note shnilar to one of the scolding notes of the red squi•zel."This observation was made in the woodland on my father's farm, near Yarmouth, Nova Scotia.Although I have not infrequently observed Canada Jays in Nova Scotia since the date of this occm'rence, I have never since then heard one of them utter any pleasing or musical notes, or anything which co,fid be considered a song.--HARaISONF. LEWIS, Quebec, P• Q. Evening Grosbeak in New Jemey.--On the 1919 Washington's Birthday field trip of the Delaware Valley Ornithological Chub, to New Lisbon, N.J., a flock of 27 Evening Grosbeaks (Hesperiphona vespertina vespertina) were observed in the same trees where the birds were fm•nd on February 22, 1917.This oceun-ence is surprising since no others have beefi reported in this vicinity during the past winter and they have apparently not been common in the states to the northward.--WiTMEaSTONE, Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia.The Pine Grosbeak (Pinicola enucleator leucura) in Northwostern New Jersey.--Through the kindness of Mr. Justus von Lengerke, I am able to record a flock of four Pine Grosbeaks seen by him at Stag Lake, Sussex Co., N.J., on February 9, 1919.The birds, two of which were addfit males, were observed at a distance of a few feet.Through previous acquaintance with the species they were at once recognized as Pine Grosbeaks.That these birds seldom reach Sussex Cmmty is evident from the fact that, during a residence of many years at Stag Lake, Mr. yon Lengerke had never before seen this species there.--W.DEW.MmLER, American Museum of Natural History, New York City.Early Occurronco of the Red-breasted Nuthatch in Now Jorsoy.--OnJuly 18, 1918, I sa•v a Red-breasted Nuthatch (Sitta canadensis) in the Pitch Pines bordcring Lily Lake, Cape May Point, N.J., at the southernmost extremity of the state.When first seen it was some distance away and I supposed for the moment that IXhad a straggling exmnple of the Brown-headed species before me, which occurs regularly in southern Delaware, across the bay, but upon approaching I found it to be the Redbreasted species.I watched it at close quarters for fifteen mimeres, but saw no other individuals.This is much the earliest record that I have for southern New Jersey or the Philadelphia district.--W•TMERST0XE, Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia.Vol.XXX¾I l
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.253 | 0.040 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".