Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the official organ of the Union ' The Auk' is the leading ornithological !publication of this country.Each nulnber contains about •oo pages of text, a lmndsomely colored plate, and other illustrations.The principal articles are by recognized authorities and are of both a scieatific and populm' nature.The department of ' General Notes ' gives brief records of new and interesting facts I concerning birds contributed by observers from throughout the United States ß and Canada.Recent ornithological literature is reviewed at length and newS, items are comlnented upon by the editors.'The Auk'is thus indispensable to those who x•ould be kept informed of the advance made in the study of birds either in the tnusenm el-in the field.• PRICE OF CURRENT VOLUME, 153.oo.• SINGLE NUMBERS.75 cts. Check-List of North American Birds.•ECOND EDITION, THOROUGHLY REVISED.The second edition of the A. O. U. Check-List was published in Decembet, •895.The Code of Nmnenclaturc is omitted, but in other respects the matter i.• the same as that of the first edition, except that it bas been most care•ull?revised, and tl•e recent changes in nomenclature, and the species and subspecies described since •886 are included.The ranges of the birds have also been largel) rex•ritten and the subject of geographical distribution brought dox•n to date.8vo.. CLOTH.PRICE, i he Code of Nomenclature Adopted by the American Ornithologists' Union.Tiffs is the report of a Co•nmittee of the Union on Nmnenclature.It was published originall 3 in tbe first editioa of the Check-List and since issued separately.8vo., PAPER, •89L PRICE, $o cts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.915 | 0.909 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".