MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7153702276

Hudsonian Chickadees at Hatley, Stanstead County, Quebec

2024· article· W7153702276 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
H. Mousley

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSwampAltitude (triangle)PopulationLow altitude
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Morris County, at an altitude of 933 feet above sea-level.The low, moist woods that the Warblers had chosen for their home consists chiefly of Red Maple, with an tindergrowth of Sweet Pepperbush, Swamp Azalea, Arrowwood, Black Alder, High Blueberry, Skunk Cabbage, Cinnamon and Royal Ferns, etc.The birds were always met near a road where the swamp xvas bordered by higher ground, about one-eighth of a mile from the Lake.This is, so far as I know, the first recorded instance of the breeding of the Canada Warbler in New Jersey.--W.DEW.MmLEa, American Museum of Natural History, New York City.Mockingbird at West Haven, Conn.--A Mockingbird (Mimus polyglotres polyglotres) appeared near the center of West Haven, Conn., on November 8, 1916, and has been observed almost every day up to January 22, 1917.It usually appears with a flock of Starlings.It pays no attention to food put out for the birds but prefers to eat the berries of the Bitter Sweet and Honeysuckle vines which grow along the fence.It does not appear to be wild as on two occasions I have walked under the apple tree in which it was perched.--N.E. W•LMOT, West Haven, Conn.Hudsonian Chickadees at Hatley, Stanstead County, Quebec.-On October 10, 1916, I came across two examples of the HudsonJan Chickadee (Penthes!eshudsonicus subsp.?) in the same wood as the pair recorded in ' The Auk,' Vol.33, 1916, p. 184; and they remained there until November 12. Between these dates I saw them on ten occasions, and generally they were in the company with a few P. atricapillus but it was quite an easy matter to locate them from the latter by their notes alone, without seeing them, and this I often did following up the sound until a view of the birds was obtained and identification confirmed.--H.MousL•Y, Harley, Qu½.Penthestes hudsonicus at Portland, Maine.--Penthesteshudsonicus, which did not come under the writcr's observation at Portland during his collecting days, has twice made known to him its presence there since.On April 27, 1913, I watched a bird for three quarters of an hour as it moved about in trees and bushes at the west end of Portland,--alone most of the time but occasionally joined by a small party of Black-capped Chickadees (P.atricapillus atricapillus) which chanccd to be in the neighborhood.Another bird passed much of the afternoon of October 27, 1913, near my house on Vaughan Street, Portland, and was identified only by its frequent call-notes.Since no specimens of P. hudsonicus are in existence from Portland or its vicinity, so far as I am aware, it seems best at present not to express an opinion as to the subspecies which was represented by these birds.--NXTuA•CLiFfORD BROW•, Portland, Maine."One of the Rarest Birds."--Under this caption Dr. Harterr (Novit.Zool., X_XIII, Dec., 1916, 335-336, pl. 1) has recently given a brief history, Vol.XXXIV] 1917 I General Notes.215 Morris County, at an altitude of 933 feet above sea-level.The low, moist woods that the Warblers had chosen for their home consists chiefly of Red Maple, with an tindergrowth of Sweet Pepperbush, Swamp Azalea, Arrowwood, Black Alder, High Blueberry, Skunk Cabbage, Cinnamon and Royal Ferns, etc.The birds were always met near a road where the swamp xvas bordered by higher ground, about one-eighth of a mile from the Lake.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→