MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7153959192

Phenomenological Model of Laval Nozzle of wich Accounts for the Stage of Acceleration of Gas Turbine of a Gas

2002· other· en· W7153959192 on OpenAlex
J. S. Rudas

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMecánica Computacional (Asociación Argentina de Mecánica Computacional) · 2002
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNozzleAccelerationCombustionPhenomenological modelDiscretizationConvergence (economics)TurbineCombustion chamber
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the development of a phenomenological model semi-physical of Laval nozzle, a device that accounts for the stage of acceleration of combustion gases in a gas turbine. This model is based on the balances of energy, momentum and continuity of the combustion gases flowing through the Laval nozzle and is carried out considering the equations governing the dynamics of the nozzle and reducing dimensionally, by discretization of a dimensional infinite system to finite dimensional in order to be workable from the perspective of the language of control theory. The operation point of which it develops such a model is similar to the conditions of operating a gas turbine General Electric 7FA in regard to pressure, temperature, speed, density and thermodynamic properties of combustion gases travel through Turbine. The phenomenological model allows constructing a control language model and simulation studies versus open-loop simulation of the Laval nozzle performed with CFD, that is, making the simulation of the dynamic model of the Laval nozzle at steady state and compared with the convergence of the simulation of the Laval nozzle held in FLUENT® to perform a stability analysis and propose alternatives for the system control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.539
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it