Phenomenological Model of Laval Nozzle of wich Accounts for the Stage of Acceleration of Gas Turbine of a Gas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the development of a phenomenological model semi-physical of Laval nozzle, a device that accounts for the stage of acceleration of combustion gases in a gas turbine. This model is based on the balances of energy, momentum and continuity of the combustion gases flowing through the Laval nozzle and is carried out considering the equations governing the dynamics of the nozzle and reducing dimensionally, by discretization of a dimensional infinite system to finite dimensional in order to be workable from the perspective of the language of control theory. The operation point of which it develops such a model is similar to the conditions of operating a gas turbine General Electric 7FA in regard to pressure, temperature, speed, density and thermodynamic properties of combustion gases travel through Turbine. The phenomenological model allows constructing a control language model and simulation studies versus open-loop simulation of the Laval nozzle performed with CFD, that is, making the simulation of the dynamic model of the Laval nozzle at steady state and compared with the convergence of the simulation of the Laval nozzle held in FLUENT® to perform a stability analysis and propose alternatives for the system control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".